<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 639 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and deleting the additions for unexplained cash credits for both assessment years. The decision was based on the lack of evidentiary value in the seized documents and inconsistencies in the assessment of income. The alternative grounds raised were not considered after allowing the main grounds of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 639 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and deleting the additions for unexplained cash credits for both assessment years. The decision was based on the lack of evidentiary value in the seized documents and inconsistencies in the assessment of income. The alternative grounds raised were not considered after allowing the main grounds of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>