<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 638 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253321</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that Section 194LA of the Income Tax Act was not applicable to the issuance of Development Rights Certificates (DRCs) by BBMP as there was no monetary payment or compulsory acquisition involved. Consequently, the orders treating BBMP as an &quot;Assessee in Default&quot; for not deducting tax at source were quashed. The appeals by BBMP were allowed, and the stay petitions became infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 638 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253321</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that Section 194LA of the Income Tax Act was not applicable to the issuance of Development Rights Certificates (DRCs) by BBMP as there was no monetary payment or compulsory acquisition involved. Consequently, the orders treating BBMP as an &quot;Assessee in Default&quot; for not deducting tax at source were quashed. The appeals by BBMP were allowed, and the stay petitions became infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>