<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 635 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253318</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the Vapour Absorption Machine qualifies as an energy-saving device eligible for 100% depreciation under the Income Tax Rules. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer&#039;s attempt to rectify the depreciation rate to 25% was unjustified and lacked legal basis. Consequently, the Court found no substantial question of law to consider and dismissed the appeals without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:06:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 635 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253318</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the Vapour Absorption Machine qualifies as an energy-saving device eligible for 100% depreciation under the Income Tax Rules. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer&#039;s attempt to rectify the depreciation rate to 25% was unjustified and lacked legal basis. Consequently, the Court found no substantial question of law to consider and dismissed the appeals without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>