<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 630 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for modification, highlighting the significance of proper service of orders and adherence to statutory requirements under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the need for actual delivery to fulfill legal service obligations, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments based on misrepresentation and lack of clarity in the application for modification of the stay order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 630 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for modification, highlighting the significance of proper service of orders and adherence to statutory requirements under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the need for actual delivery to fulfill legal service obligations, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments based on misrepresentation and lack of clarity in the application for modification of the stay order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>