<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 628 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and stay application due to an unexplained delay of 414 days. The High Court directed the appellants to deposit the duty amount and instructed the Tribunal to hear the appeal promptly. A demand for service tax on residential complex service was imposed, but the liability for tax before a specific date was disputed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the tax demand and penalties. For construction of industrial or commercial complex service, penalties were waived due to confusion over tax liability. The demand for service tax on commercial or industrial complex service was upheld, with penalties set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 628 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and stay application due to an unexplained delay of 414 days. The High Court directed the appellants to deposit the duty amount and instructed the Tribunal to hear the appeal promptly. A demand for service tax on residential complex service was imposed, but the liability for tax before a specific date was disputed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the tax demand and penalties. For construction of industrial or commercial complex service, penalties were waived due to confusion over tax liability. The demand for service tax on commercial or industrial complex service was upheld, with penalties set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>