<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 627 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253310</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant&#039;s eligibility for CENVAT credit on input services like rent-a-cab, insurance, and event management services, essential for their BPO operations. It dismissed the demand for CENVAT credit on amounts written off due to non-payment, stating service tax is payable upon receipt of consideration. The tribunal criticized the lack of proof of payment in a specific period and remanded the issue for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to legal provisions. All demands and penalties were set aside except for the unpaid amount, which was remanded for reevaluation by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 627 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253310</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant&#039;s eligibility for CENVAT credit on input services like rent-a-cab, insurance, and event management services, essential for their BPO operations. It dismissed the demand for CENVAT credit on amounts written off due to non-payment, stating service tax is payable upon receipt of consideration. The tribunal criticized the lack of proof of payment in a specific period and remanded the issue for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to legal provisions. All demands and penalties were set aside except for the unpaid amount, which was remanded for reevaluation by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>