<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 618 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253301</link>
    <description>The High Court found the Tribunal&#039;s decision lacking in adequately considering the delay period in filing an appeal against Central Excise Orders. The Court emphasized the need for a bona fide explanation for the delay and directed the Tribunal to reevaluate the condonation application, highlighting errors in the previous assessment. The Court stressed the importance of genuine reasons for delay, particularly in cases involving office takeover situations. A different outcome was suggested if the delay period was viewed more leniently, prompting the Court to set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and instruct a prompt reexamination of the application within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 618 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253301</link>
      <description>The High Court found the Tribunal&#039;s decision lacking in adequately considering the delay period in filing an appeal against Central Excise Orders. The Court emphasized the need for a bona fide explanation for the delay and directed the Tribunal to reevaluate the condonation application, highlighting errors in the previous assessment. The Court stressed the importance of genuine reasons for delay, particularly in cases involving office takeover situations. A different outcome was suggested if the delay period was viewed more leniently, prompting the Court to set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and instruct a prompt reexamination of the application within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>