<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 583 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, ruling that the extended period for demand was not invocable. A pre-deposit amount of Rs. 17 lakhs plus interest was ordered within four weeks, with recovery of the remaining tax, interest, and penalties stayed during the appeal. Failure to comply would result in the appeal&#039;s rejection. The stay application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 583 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, ruling that the extended period for demand was not invocable. A pre-deposit amount of Rs. 17 lakhs plus interest was ordered within four weeks, with recovery of the remaining tax, interest, and penalties stayed during the appeal. Failure to comply would result in the appeal&#039;s rejection. The stay application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>