<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 577 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the manufacturer&#039;s refund claim of accumulated unutilized CENVAT credit on exported goods. It held that no double benefits were availed as duty-free imported inputs were used for domestic production, while duty-paid inputs were utilized for exported goods. The Tribunal emphasized that a one-to-one correlation between inputs and exported goods was not required for the refund claim under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside, granting the manufacturer consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 577 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the manufacturer&#039;s refund claim of accumulated unutilized CENVAT credit on exported goods. It held that no double benefits were availed as duty-free imported inputs were used for domestic production, while duty-paid inputs were utilized for exported goods. The Tribunal emphasized that a one-to-one correlation between inputs and exported goods was not required for the refund claim under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside, granting the manufacturer consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>