https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253254 Binding precedent controlled the controversy: the Revenue conceded that the issue was already covered against it by the earlier Supreme Court ruling in Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi v. Carrier Aircon Ltd., and the Court therefore declined to entertain the appeal. The appeal was dismissed on that basis, with no order as to costs. en-us Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2015 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253254 Binding precedent controlled the controversy: the Revenue conceded that the issue was already covered against it by the earlier Supreme Court ruling in Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi v. Carrier Aircon Ltd., and the Court therefore declined to entertain the appeal. The appeal was dismissed on that basis, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253254