<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 565 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253248</link>
    <description>The court upheld the reduction of the opening cash balance to Rs. 3,00,000, treated Rs. 85,000 received for remodeling the house as undisclosed income, and remanded the issue of bad debts for further consideration. The court answered substantial questions of law against the assessee and in favor of the revenue, dismissing one case and remanding another.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 565 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253248</link>
      <description>The court upheld the reduction of the opening cash balance to Rs. 3,00,000, treated Rs. 85,000 received for remodeling the house as undisclosed income, and remanded the issue of bad debts for further consideration. The court answered substantial questions of law against the assessee and in favor of the revenue, dismissing one case and remanding another.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>