<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 548 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and remanded the case to the AO. The AO was instructed not to add deposits in the firm&#039;s bank account to the individual&#039;s income. The Tribunal directed that telescoping should be allowed if the assessee can prove expenses or investments were made from withdrawals from the firm&#039;s account. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 548 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and remanded the case to the AO. The AO was instructed not to add deposits in the firm&#039;s bank account to the individual&#039;s income. The Tribunal directed that telescoping should be allowed if the assessee can prove expenses or investments were made from withdrawals from the firm&#039;s account. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>