<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Wrongly Dismissed Appeal for Lack of Prosecution; Should Have Considered Merits Despite Absence of Appellant.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20696</link>
    <description>Tribunal could not have dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant for want of prosecution and it ought to have decided the appeal on merits even if the appellant or its counsel was not present when the appeal was taken up for hearing - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:09:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:09:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Wrongly Dismissed Appeal for Lack of Prosecution; Should Have Considered Merits Despite Absence of Appellant.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20696</link>
      <description>Tribunal could not have dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant for want of prosecution and it ought to have decided the appeal on merits even if the appellant or its counsel was not present when the appeal was taken up for hearing - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:09:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>