<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253225</link>
    <description>The case involved an appeal rejection challenge due to lack of power to remand and issues related to document verification and service tax payment. The Judge ruled in favor of remanding the matter to allow for the verification of documents by the adjudicating authority. This decision aimed to ensure fairness and accuracy in assessing the service tax payments and to provide both parties with an opportunity to present their case based on verified information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:33:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253225</link>
      <description>The case involved an appeal rejection challenge due to lack of power to remand and issues related to document verification and service tax payment. The Judge ruled in favor of remanding the matter to allow for the verification of documents by the adjudicating authority. This decision aimed to ensure fairness and accuracy in assessing the service tax payments and to provide both parties with an opportunity to present their case based on verified information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>