https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253224 The Tribunal held that service tax was due for the period from July 2003 to September 2004 for services to specific banks under Business Auxiliary Service. However, post-amendment activities were exempt from service tax as they fell under Business Support Service. Penalties were imposed for not separately charging service tax, with remunerations treated as cum-service charges. The appeals were disposed of with a directive for payment of service tax with interest for the specified period. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253224 The Tribunal held that service tax was due for the period from July 2003 to September 2004 for services to specific banks under Business Auxiliary Service. However, post-amendment activities were exempt from service tax as they fell under Business Support Service. Penalties were imposed for not separately charging service tax, with remunerations treated as cum-service charges. The appeals were disposed of with a directive for payment of service tax with interest for the specified period. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253224