<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 534 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253217</link>
    <description>The High Court found the writ petition maintainable and justified interference with the show cause notice. The court held that the notice was issued without jurisdiction and constituted an abuse of process, as the petitioner was entitled to exemptions supported by longstanding practices and government decisions. Consequently, the court set aside the notice, ruling in favor of the petitioner and quashing the show cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 534 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253217</link>
      <description>The High Court found the writ petition maintainable and justified interference with the show cause notice. The court held that the notice was issued without jurisdiction and constituted an abuse of process, as the petitioner was entitled to exemptions supported by longstanding practices and government decisions. Consequently, the court set aside the notice, ruling in favor of the petitioner and quashing the show cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>