<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 531 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253214</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution as it lacked the explicit power to do so under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act. The Court directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal on its merits, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the respondent was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 25,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 531 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253214</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution as it lacked the explicit power to do so under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act. The Court directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal on its merits, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the respondent was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 25,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>