<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 530 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that imported homeopathic medicines are subject to Additional Customs Duty (ACD) at 5%, aligning with the excise duty on similar Indian goods to ensure fair competition. It held that the Commissioner (Appeals) exceeded jurisdiction by addressing the duty&#039;s constitutionality. The Tribunal emphasized that statutory authorities should not delve into constitutional matters. It was established that imported goods availed input tax credit in the exporting country, justifying the 5% ACD. The decision overturned the reduced 1% duty, emphasizing the need for competitive parity. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, reinstating the 5% ACD imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 530 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that imported homeopathic medicines are subject to Additional Customs Duty (ACD) at 5%, aligning with the excise duty on similar Indian goods to ensure fair competition. It held that the Commissioner (Appeals) exceeded jurisdiction by addressing the duty&#039;s constitutionality. The Tribunal emphasized that statutory authorities should not delve into constitutional matters. It was established that imported goods availed input tax credit in the exporting country, justifying the 5% ACD. The decision overturned the reduced 1% duty, emphasizing the need for competitive parity. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, reinstating the 5% ACD imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>