<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 523 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253206</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the restoration of penalty proceedings back to the Assessing Officer (A.O.) for reconsideration. The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) was instructed to dispose of the Assessee&#039;s application under section 273AA within ninety days. The Tribunal emphasized the independence of proceedings under section 273AA and section 271(1)(c) and the need for the A.O. to adhere to statutory timelines in penalty proceedings. The restoration aimed to enable the Assessee to potentially claim immunity under section 273AA and address any prejudice caused by the non-disposal of the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 523 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253206</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the restoration of penalty proceedings back to the Assessing Officer (A.O.) for reconsideration. The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) was instructed to dispose of the Assessee&#039;s application under section 273AA within ninety days. The Tribunal emphasized the independence of proceedings under section 273AA and section 271(1)(c) and the need for the A.O. to adhere to statutory timelines in penalty proceedings. The restoration aimed to enable the Assessee to potentially claim immunity under section 273AA and address any prejudice caused by the non-disposal of the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>