<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 515 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253198</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments made by the AO/TPO. The tribunal upheld the increase in the risk adjustment percentage from 0.5% to 1% and directed the AO to re-examine the inclusion of domestic expenditure for proper verification. Additionally, the tribunal clarified that the Assessee should benefit from the range of +/- 5% without a separate claim and directed a re-examination of the margin computation of a comparable company. The exclusion of Zen Technologies Ltd. as a comparable company was upheld due to its functional differences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 515 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253198</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments made by the AO/TPO. The tribunal upheld the increase in the risk adjustment percentage from 0.5% to 1% and directed the AO to re-examine the inclusion of domestic expenditure for proper verification. Additionally, the tribunal clarified that the Assessee should benefit from the range of +/- 5% without a separate claim and directed a re-examination of the margin computation of a comparable company. The exclusion of Zen Technologies Ltd. as a comparable company was upheld due to its functional differences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>