<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 509 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253192</link>
    <description>The appeals were partly allowed, with some additions confirmed and others deleted based on the genuineness and substantiation of the explanations provided by the assessee. The judgment emphasizes the importance of specific and substantiated explanations to prove the genuineness of credit entries, gifts, and loans in income tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:52:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 509 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253192</link>
      <description>The appeals were partly allowed, with some additions confirmed and others deleted based on the genuineness and substantiation of the explanations provided by the assessee. The judgment emphasizes the importance of specific and substantiated explanations to prove the genuineness of credit entries, gifts, and loans in income tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>