https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166968 The Madras High Court rejected the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs against the CESTAT Final Order, determining that the duty rate applicable to goods cleared from a Customs Bonded Warehouse is based on the date of actual removal, not the expiry of the warehousing period. The Court held that the issue primarily concerned the applicable rate of duty, falling within the Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 130-E(b) of the Customs Act. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, citing jurisdictional limitations and closed the connected Miscellaneous Petition without costs. en-us Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:26:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166968 The Madras High Court rejected the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs against the CESTAT Final Order, determining that the duty rate applicable to goods cleared from a Customs Bonded Warehouse is based on the date of actual removal, not the expiry of the warehousing period. The Court held that the issue primarily concerned the applicable rate of duty, falling within the Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 130-E(b) of the Customs Act. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, citing jurisdictional limitations and closed the connected Miscellaneous Petition without costs. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166968