https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253188 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's request for modification of previous orders regarding the deposit amount and restoration of the stay application. The Tribunal considered the order passed without notice to the appellant as null and void, directing a fresh consideration of the stay application. Despite opposition from the respondent, the Tribunal emphasized the challenges faced by appellants in verifying hearing dates and decided to reconsider the matter, following CESTAT's Circular, by allowing the miscellaneous application and scheduling the stay application for a hearing on a specified date. en-us Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253188 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's request for modification of previous orders regarding the deposit amount and restoration of the stay application. The Tribunal considered the order passed without notice to the appellant as null and void, directing a fresh consideration of the stay application. Despite opposition from the respondent, the Tribunal emphasized the challenges faced by appellants in verifying hearing dates and decided to reconsider the matter, following CESTAT's Circular, by allowing the miscellaneous application and scheduling the stay application for a hearing on a specified date. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253188