<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 301 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166964</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court reaffirmed that settled seniority rulings in the Income-tax Service would not be reopened absent fresh, compelling material or other substantial reasons. It held that alleged errors in earlier decisions, non-production of every file, and later materials such as the Rajya Sabha Committee report did not undermine the prior judicial conclusions. Emphasising finality in service disputes, the Court stated that review or reconsideration is exceptional and requires new and important evidence or similarly strong grounds. The challenge to the earlier rulings therefore failed, and no basis was shown to disturb the existing seniority arrangements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 301 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166964</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court reaffirmed that settled seniority rulings in the Income-tax Service would not be reopened absent fresh, compelling material or other substantial reasons. It held that alleged errors in earlier decisions, non-production of every file, and later materials such as the Rajya Sabha Committee report did not undermine the prior judicial conclusions. Emphasising finality in service disputes, the Court stated that review or reconsideration is exceptional and requires new and important evidence or similarly strong grounds. The challenge to the earlier rulings therefore failed, and no basis was shown to disturb the existing seniority arrangements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>