<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 492 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253175</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the refund claim was inadmissible as the bill of entry was not challenged at the time of vessel conversion, and provisional assessment was not requested as per CBEC Circular No. 58/97. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following the Circular&#039;s provisions for provisional assessment during vessel conversion, ultimately setting aside the lower authority&#039;s decision and rejecting the respondent&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 492 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253175</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the refund claim was inadmissible as the bill of entry was not challenged at the time of vessel conversion, and provisional assessment was not requested as per CBEC Circular No. 58/97. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following the Circular&#039;s provisions for provisional assessment during vessel conversion, ultimately setting aside the lower authority&#039;s decision and rejecting the respondent&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>