<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 485 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act and the disallowance of prior period expenses. However, the issues of capital introduction and unsecured loans were remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:15:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 485 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act and the disallowance of prior period expenses. However, the issues of capital introduction and unsecured loans were remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>