<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 483 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the deletion of disallowance related to reimbursement of salaries and expenses of seconded employees. The issue of professional fees reimbursement was remanded to the AO for fresh examination. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the DRP&#039;s deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment, validating the comparables chosen by the assessee for determining the arm&#039;s length price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 483 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the deletion of disallowance related to reimbursement of salaries and expenses of seconded employees. The issue of professional fees reimbursement was remanded to the AO for fresh examination. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the DRP&#039;s deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment, validating the comparables chosen by the assessee for determining the arm&#039;s length price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>