<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 482 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253165</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, finding that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation. The Court held that the deposits found in bank accounts during the search constituted undisclosed income and should have been taxed. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 482 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253165</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, finding that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation. The Court held that the deposits found in bank accounts during the search constituted undisclosed income and should have been taxed. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>