<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 480 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253163</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals and answering the substantial questions of law in favor of the appellant against the Revenue for the assessment years in question. The appellant was justified in adopting different accounting methods for bookkeeping and tax determination before the relevant amendment, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant for the assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:14:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 480 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253163</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals and answering the substantial questions of law in favor of the appellant against the Revenue for the assessment years in question. The appellant was justified in adopting different accounting methods for bookkeeping and tax determination before the relevant amendment, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant for the assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>