<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 471 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions made by the A.O. and confirmed by the CIT(A). The &quot;Take Out Assistance Fees&quot; were classified as revenue expenditure, and the amortization of Zero Coupon Bonds (Series B) was also treated as revenue expenditure. The decision aligned with precedents favoring the assessee, emphasizing the revenue nature of the expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 471 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions made by the A.O. and confirmed by the CIT(A). The &quot;Take Out Assistance Fees&quot; were classified as revenue expenditure, and the amortization of Zero Coupon Bonds (Series B) was also treated as revenue expenditure. The decision aligned with precedents favoring the assessee, emphasizing the revenue nature of the expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>