<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 469 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253152</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for all the disallowed expenses. The disallowances were based on the reasonableness of expenses, not on the accuracy of particulars furnished by the assessee. The Tribunal found the explanations provided were not malicious, and the disclosures in the books of account were legally sufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:14:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 469 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253152</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for all the disallowed expenses. The disallowances were based on the reasonableness of expenses, not on the accuracy of particulars furnished by the assessee. The Tribunal found the explanations provided were not malicious, and the disclosures in the books of account were legally sufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>