<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 467 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253150</link>
    <description>Service tax was not leviable on club services provided to members under the relevant Finance Act provisions, because the factual matrix matched the earlier ruling on the same taxability issue and the Tribunal was justified in applying that ratio. The Court also stated that a declaration of unconstitutionality operates in rem, not merely inter partes, so the earlier finding on invalidity could be relied on beyond the original litigants. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s order setting aside the departmental demand was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 467 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253150</link>
      <description>Service tax was not leviable on club services provided to members under the relevant Finance Act provisions, because the factual matrix matched the earlier ruling on the same taxability issue and the Tribunal was justified in applying that ratio. The Court also stated that a declaration of unconstitutionality operates in rem, not merely inter partes, so the earlier finding on invalidity could be relied on beyond the original litigants. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s order setting aside the departmental demand was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>