<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 466 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253149</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal due to the lack of diligence by the appellant, advocate, and tax consultant in pursuing the matter. Emphasizing the importance of substantial justice over technicalities, the Court found the medical certificate provided by the appellant insufficient and lacking supporting evidence. Referring to previous guidelines, the Court highlighted the need for a liberal approach in condonation of delay applications but stressed that lack of bona fides from the party seeking condonation is a crucial factor. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 466 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253149</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal due to the lack of diligence by the appellant, advocate, and tax consultant in pursuing the matter. Emphasizing the importance of substantial justice over technicalities, the Court found the medical certificate provided by the appellant insufficient and lacking supporting evidence. Referring to previous guidelines, the Court highlighted the need for a liberal approach in condonation of delay applications but stressed that lack of bona fides from the party seeking condonation is a crucial factor. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>