<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 464 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of a refund claim for service tax paid under protest for seismic surveys in offshore areas. The Tribunal found that the retrospective application of the amended notification would be punitive and contrary to the judgment&#039;s intent. It also noted the absence of unjust enrichment and supported the appellant&#039;s claim, ultimately granting relief by setting aside the impugned order on 9.10.2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 464 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of a refund claim for service tax paid under protest for seismic surveys in offshore areas. The Tribunal found that the retrospective application of the amended notification would be punitive and contrary to the judgment&#039;s intent. It also noted the absence of unjust enrichment and supported the appellant&#039;s claim, ultimately granting relief by setting aside the impugned order on 9.10.2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>