https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253145 The Tribunal upheld the stay order directing the appellant to pre-deposit a specified sum and emphasized compliance. The appellant's request for modification based on service classification and Cenvat credit was rejected. The Tribunal found the service provided aligned with Cargo Handling Service, not Goods Transport Agency Service. The appellant's failure to submit necessary documents and untimely actions led to the dismissal of their application. Non-compliance would result in appeal dismissal, emphasizing adherence to the stay order requirements. en-us Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:24:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253145 The Tribunal upheld the stay order directing the appellant to pre-deposit a specified sum and emphasized compliance. The appellant's request for modification based on service classification and Cenvat credit was rejected. The Tribunal found the service provided aligned with Cargo Handling Service, not Goods Transport Agency Service. The appellant's failure to submit necessary documents and untimely actions led to the dismissal of their application. Non-compliance would result in appeal dismissal, emphasizing adherence to the stay order requirements. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253145