<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 458 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253141</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed three appeals challenging orders of the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding pre-deposit of duty and penalties based on alleged bogus invoices for Cenvat credit on inputs. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to direct pre-deposit was upheld due to prima facie evidence of non-receipt of inputs as per invoices, supported by admissions from the appellant&#039;s Director and employees, as well as a substantial cash balance. The Court emphasized the significance of prima facie evidence and the appellant&#039;s financial position in affirming the Tribunal&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 458 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253141</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed three appeals challenging orders of the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding pre-deposit of duty and penalties based on alleged bogus invoices for Cenvat credit on inputs. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to direct pre-deposit was upheld due to prima facie evidence of non-receipt of inputs as per invoices, supported by admissions from the appellant&#039;s Director and employees, as well as a substantial cash balance. The Court emphasized the significance of prima facie evidence and the appellant&#039;s financial position in affirming the Tribunal&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>