<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 451 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253134</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the appeal based on the exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of time exclusion under Section 14, ensuring the appeal was within the limitation period when presented before the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 451 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253134</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the appeal based on the exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of time exclusion under Section 14, ensuring the appeal was within the limitation period when presented before the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>