<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 449 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253132</link>
    <description>The Court refrained from setting a time limit for the Tribunal to hear the appeal but requested consideration for early hearing within three months due to financial hardship faced by the appellant. The judgment emphasized balancing effective Tribunal functioning with appellant&#039;s situation, highlighting the need for fair administration of justice amidst heavy caseloads.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 449 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253132</link>
      <description>The Court refrained from setting a time limit for the Tribunal to hear the appeal but requested consideration for early hearing within three months due to financial hardship faced by the appellant. The judgment emphasized balancing effective Tribunal functioning with appellant&#039;s situation, highlighting the need for fair administration of justice amidst heavy caseloads.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>