<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1120 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166950</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeal as the demand for additional duty was time-barred since the extended period was not invoked in the show-cause notice. The decision was based on the time limit for demand of short-paid duty being only six months at the relevant time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1120 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166950</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeal as the demand for additional duty was time-barred since the extended period was not invoked in the show-cause notice. The decision was based on the time limit for demand of short-paid duty being only six months at the relevant time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>