<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253115</link>
    <description>Cross-border receipts arising under a general service arrangement required examination under the India-USA treaty to determine whether they constituted royalty or fees for included services. The tax authorities had proceeded on conflicting bases and had not analysed the receipts in the proper treaty context or applied the relevant legal tests and case law. As the character of the receipts and the applicable treaty provisions had not been properly assessed, the orders were set aside and the matter was restored for de novo consideration by the assessing officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253115</link>
      <description>Cross-border receipts arising under a general service arrangement required examination under the India-USA treaty to determine whether they constituted royalty or fees for included services. The tax authorities had proceeded on conflicting bases and had not analysed the receipts in the proper treaty context or applied the relevant legal tests and case law. As the character of the receipts and the applicable treaty provisions had not been properly assessed, the orders were set aside and the matter was restored for de novo consideration by the assessing officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>