<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 619 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166946</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court rejected Punjab&#039;s suit challenging the decree and directed the Union of India to complete the SYL canal, emphasizing the binding nature of the agreements and the constitutional duty to comply with judicial decrees. The principles of res judicata and the need for maintaining law and order were underscored in ensuring the execution of the decree.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 619 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166946</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court rejected Punjab&#039;s suit challenging the decree and directed the Union of India to complete the SYL canal, emphasizing the binding nature of the agreements and the constitutional duty to comply with judicial decrees. The principles of res judicata and the need for maintaining law and order were underscored in ensuring the execution of the decree.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>