https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166944 The Court dismissed the revisional application, affirming the Civil Court's jurisdiction over the contractual dispute. The petitioner's failure to establish grounds for review and the lack of sufficient relevance of subsequent events led to the rejection of the application to review the ex parte decree. The Court highlighted the importance of demonstrating due diligence and presenting new evidence at the time of the original decree to warrant a review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. en-us Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166944 The Court dismissed the revisional application, affirming the Civil Court's jurisdiction over the contractual dispute. The petitioner's failure to establish grounds for review and the lack of sufficient relevance of subsequent events led to the rejection of the application to review the ex parte decree. The Court highlighted the importance of demonstrating due diligence and presenting new evidence at the time of the original decree to warrant a review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166944