<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 542 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166933</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the CESTAT&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the Revenue in a case concerning the interpretation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and the applicability of Cenvat credit in instances of default in duty payment. The Court found that the CESTAT erred in applying a previous judgment and emphasized the current rule&#039;s provisions, ultimately holding the assessee liable for duty, interest, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 542 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166933</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the CESTAT&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the Revenue in a case concerning the interpretation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and the applicability of Cenvat credit in instances of default in duty payment. The Court found that the CESTAT erred in applying a previous judgment and emphasized the current rule&#039;s provisions, ultimately holding the assessee liable for duty, interest, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>