<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Depreciation on Roads and Bridges Upheld by CIT(A): Full Project Cost Deductible for Assessee as Amortized or Depreciation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20665</link>
    <description>Since the CIT(A) allowed depreciation on roads/bridges there is no reason to interfere with the order of CIT(A) as the entire cost incurred on the project is to be allowed as deduction to assessee either as amortized revenue expenditure or as depreciation - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:29:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:29:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Depreciation on Roads and Bridges Upheld by CIT(A): Full Project Cost Deductible for Assessee as Amortized or Depreciation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20665</link>
      <description>Since the CIT(A) allowed depreciation on roads/bridges there is no reason to interfere with the order of CIT(A) as the entire cost incurred on the project is to be allowed as deduction to assessee either as amortized revenue expenditure or as depreciation - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:29:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>