<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 405 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253088</link>
    <description>Rule 8D was held inapplicable for assessment year 2005-06, so any disallowance linked to exempt dividend income had to be computed only on a reasonable basis under section 14A, having regard to the facts and movement of funds. The write-off of inter-corporate deposits and accrued interest was also examined as a possible bad debt claim, but the record required verification of whether the advances were made in the ordinary course of a lending business and whether the assessee&#039;s non-banking finance status affected the deduction. The bad debt issue was therefore remanded for fresh examination of the nature of the advance and the applicable deduction provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:21:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 405 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253088</link>
      <description>Rule 8D was held inapplicable for assessment year 2005-06, so any disallowance linked to exempt dividend income had to be computed only on a reasonable basis under section 14A, having regard to the facts and movement of funds. The write-off of inter-corporate deposits and accrued interest was also examined as a possible bad debt claim, but the record required verification of whether the advances were made in the ordinary course of a lending business and whether the assessee&#039;s non-banking finance status affected the deduction. The bad debt issue was therefore remanded for fresh examination of the nature of the advance and the applicable deduction provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>