<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 404 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253087</link>
    <description>Payments to foreign research entities for pre-clinical and clinical study work were treated as fees for technical services because the agreements showed continuous technical interaction and the making available of technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how and processes. The fact that information, know-how, processes and intellectual property generated during the studies would vest in the payer reinforced that the services were not limited to a final report. The receipts were therefore not treated as mere business profits and were held taxable in India under the relevant treaty provisions, giving rise to a corresponding obligation to deduct tax at source. Failure to do so attracted liability under sections 201(1) and 201(1A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 404 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253087</link>
      <description>Payments to foreign research entities for pre-clinical and clinical study work were treated as fees for technical services because the agreements showed continuous technical interaction and the making available of technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how and processes. The fact that information, know-how, processes and intellectual property generated during the studies would vest in the payer reinforced that the services were not limited to a final report. The receipts were therefore not treated as mere business profits and were held taxable in India under the relevant treaty provisions, giving rise to a corresponding obligation to deduct tax at source. Failure to do so attracted liability under sections 201(1) and 201(1A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>