<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 396 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263. The AO&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80G for a donation made in the form of medical equipment was upheld, considering it as a cash donation due to payment made by cheque directly to suppliers on behalf of the donee. The Tribunal found the CIT&#039;s order to be a change of opinion and not based on new facts, affirming the correctness of the AO&#039;s initial decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:20:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 396 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263. The AO&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80G for a donation made in the form of medical equipment was upheld, considering it as a cash donation due to payment made by cheque directly to suppliers on behalf of the donee. The Tribunal found the CIT&#039;s order to be a change of opinion and not based on new facts, affirming the correctness of the AO&#039;s initial decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>