<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 394 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253077</link>
    <description>Business Auxiliary Service allegations remain sustainable where a show cause notice clearly describes procurement of orders and business promotion, even without identifying the exact definitional sub-clause. Non-disclosure of receipts from an overseas service provider in ST-3 returns or other communications, with discovery occurring during audit, may support invocation of the extended limitation period for the pre-audit period. Complete limitation relief and full waiver of pre-deposit were therefore not available; only partial pre-deposit relief was granted, with the remaining demand, interest and penalty stayed subject to the directed deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:02:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 394 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253077</link>
      <description>Business Auxiliary Service allegations remain sustainable where a show cause notice clearly describes procurement of orders and business promotion, even without identifying the exact definitional sub-clause. Non-disclosure of receipts from an overseas service provider in ST-3 returns or other communications, with discovery occurring during audit, may support invocation of the extended limitation period for the pre-audit period. Complete limitation relief and full waiver of pre-deposit were therefore not available; only partial pre-deposit relief was granted, with the remaining demand, interest and penalty stayed subject to the directed deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>