https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253074 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the appeals. It held that charges for erection, commissioning, and installation services should not be included in the assessable value of goods supplied. The distinction between manufacturing and service provision activities was crucial in determining the tax liability, as established by previous judicial pronouncements and upheld by the Tribunal in this case. en-us Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:53:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253074 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the appeals. It held that charges for erection, commissioning, and installation services should not be included in the assessable value of goods supplied. The distinction between manufacturing and service provision activities was crucial in determining the tax liability, as established by previous judicial pronouncements and upheld by the Tribunal in this case. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253074