<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 390 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253073</link>
    <description>The appellant filed a stay application challenging the operation of OIA No.VAD-EXCUS-001-APP-500-13-14 regarding Cenvat Credit issues related to Initial Public Offer (IPO) services. The judge granted a stay on the recovery of confirmed demands and penalties until the appeal&#039;s final resolution on 18.07.2014, supporting the appellant&#039;s ability to take suo moto credit without following Section 11B procedures, based on case law precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:52:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 390 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253073</link>
      <description>The appellant filed a stay application challenging the operation of OIA No.VAD-EXCUS-001-APP-500-13-14 regarding Cenvat Credit issues related to Initial Public Offer (IPO) services. The judge granted a stay on the recovery of confirmed demands and penalties until the appeal&#039;s final resolution on 18.07.2014, supporting the appellant&#039;s ability to take suo moto credit without following Section 11B procedures, based on case law precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>